Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 892
Morris v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv02647
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, Rob Jeffreys, Jeremy M. Fink and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piper v. Veith
as 4:2024cv04231
Plaintiff:
Timothy Piper
Defendant:
Michael Veith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Cleavinger et al
as 4:2024cv04227
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, . Cleavinger and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Shadid et al
as 4:2024cv04222
Defendant:
James E Shadid, Mark Rose, Kevin W Lyons and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Foxx et al
as 4:2024cv04215
Defendant:
Cook County State's Attorney's Office, Kim Foxx, State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04214
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Shan Jumper and Paula Lodge
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Plunk et al
as 4:2024cv04213
Defendant:
Abby Haughee, William Beckett, Liberty Health Care and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Echols v. Bauer et al
as 3:2024cv03319
Plaintiff:
Minosa Echols
Defendant:
Amanda Marie Stephens, Sean Suber, DaWanna LaShawn McCray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Posey
as 4:2024cv04203
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
Erin Posey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Posey et al
as 4:2024cv04206
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
Erin Posey, Greg Donathan, Mr . Clevenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
