US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,829
McCloskey et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Denise McCloskey and Dennis McCloskey
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Miday v. REV Recreation Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00423
Defendant:
REV Recreation Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Miday
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ramthun v. REV Renegade, LLC
as 1:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Blake Ramthun
Defendant:
REV Renegade, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Joneas v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC
as 3:2024cv00826
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC
Plaintiff:
Seth Joneas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Terry v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC
as 3:2024cv00827
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC
Plaintiff:
Jason Terry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Roberts v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00823
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Norman Roberts
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Holmes v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00809
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC and Cummins, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jason Holmes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Woodward et al v. Jayco, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
MARIE WOODWARD and MERBLE WOODWARD
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Reali v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Brian Reali
Defendant:
Forest River Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Acklin v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2024cv00796
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Acklin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
