US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,918
Buckley v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
Jeffery Buckley
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Carlos Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simbeck v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belcher v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Torrence Belcher
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Tiger A Rogers and Tiger Rogers
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughans v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Eddie Vaughans
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crain v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Durell T Crain
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrold v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Shane A Harrold and Shane Harrold
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tidwell v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Loren Wayne Tidwell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byers v. Sheriff
as 4:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Jason L Byers and Jason Logan Byers
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
