US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 11,265
Braden v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Defendant:
Curdy, English, Corty and others
Plaintiff:
James M Braden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Laporte County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Bertrell Randle
Defendant:
Laporte County Sheriffs Office and Quality Correctional Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flood v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Patrick Flood and Patrick S Flood
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Joshua Snow, Lorna Harbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Megan
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Baker
Defendant:
Megan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Lake County Community Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Eric Lewis
Defendant:
Lake County Community Corrections and Bratcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sines v. Fulton County of et al
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Lynn K C Sines
Defendant:
Fulton County of, Travis Hieshman, Cathy Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGruder v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Makiyah McGruder
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGowan v. Tchaptchet et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patrick McGowan
Defendant:
Tchaptchet, Cheryl and Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, Ron Neal, David Liebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGowan v. Tchaptchet et al
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patrick McGowan
Defendant:
Tchaptchet, Cheryl and Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
