US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,698
MARTINEZ v. GAINER et al
as 1:2024cv01627
Defendant:
GAINER, ALLEN and CHAPMAN
Plaintiff:
MARCO A. MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv01629
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LAMAR and MCCAFFERTY
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv01611
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Petitioner:
TYRON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv01612
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II and DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON
Defendant:
LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01609
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARRIS
Defendant:
HEATHER VERDON and DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01624
Defendant:
DAVID EMMERSON, S. OBI, E. OSEI and others
Plaintiff:
KAMREN JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RAWLS v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, SAMUEL BYRD, CARLA COAKLEY and others
Plaintiff:
IAN RAWLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERNA v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01616
Respondent:
ODELL, IYC, DONALD EMERSON and others
Petitioner:
RONALD SERNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
