US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,596
DANNON v. USA
as 1:2023cv01029
Petitioner: MAHDE DANNON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JOHNSON v. USA
as 4:2023cv00099
Petitioner: JAN DOE and KRISTY LANAE JOHNSON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SHELTON v. USA
as 1:2023cv00992
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER SHELTON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HILL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00988
Petitioner: RODERICK HILL
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HART v. USA
as 1:2023cv00950
Petitioner: DERRICK HART
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PERRYMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00892
Petitioner: MICHAEL PERRYMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GAYDEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00825
Petitioner: JENSEN DANTRELL GAYDEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
OWENS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00762
Petitioner: DERRICK OWENS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KRAMER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00755
Petitioner: JEFFREY KRAMER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WARNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00736
Petitioner: MARCELLOUS WARNER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?