Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 5,201
YOUNG v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv03266
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner: OTIS YOUNG
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MAHANEY v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00437
Petitioner: JEREMIAH MAHANEY
Miscellaneou: PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00436
Respondent: RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner: DEMETRIUS D. TAYLOR
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURREY-FITZPATRICK v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv03255
Petitioner: TENEZYA MURREY-FITZPATRICK
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LYONS v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2017cv00434
Petitioner: DAVID E. LYONS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARNOLD v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2017cv00432
Petitioner: CHARLES ARNOLD
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Miscellaneou: WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAVEZ v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv03160
Petitioner: RAYMOND CHAVEZ
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNETT v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv03170
Petitioner: DIANTE BURNETT
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SARVER v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv03153
Petitioner: CALVIN SARVER
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LINDSEY v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv03154
Petitioner: MARC A. LINDSEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?