US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,059
MAJORS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv01697
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Petitioner:
JEFF ERICK MAJORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SNELLING v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00460
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SNELLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS v. AKINDOYIN
as 1:2024cv01709
Respondent:
O. AKINDOYIN
Petitioner:
RONNIE ADAMS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv01710
Petitioner:
RONNIE ADAMS, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01682
Petitioner:
JACKIE OWEN SCOTT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DALE et al v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv01667
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
LAMONTAY AYERS and KEYON DALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GALLOWAY v. WADDAS
as 2:2024cv00453
Respondent:
J. WADDAS
Petitioner:
ZACKARY GALLOWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
OVERTON v. EMMERICH
as 1:2024cv01651
Respondent:
E. EMMERICH
Petitioner:
MARCELLUS CHRISTOPHER OVERTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
OVERTON v. EMMERICH
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
MARCELLUS OVERTON
Respondent:
E. EMMERICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WELCHES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01634
Petitioner:
KENNETH ALLEN WELCHES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
