US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 8,123
DALE et al v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv01667
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner: LAMONTAY AYERS and KEYON DALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GALLOWAY v. WADDAS
as 2:2024cv00453
Respondent: J. WADDAS
Petitioner: ZACKARY GALLOWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
OVERTON v. EMMERICH
as 1:2024cv01651
Respondent: E. EMMERICH
Petitioner: MARCELLUS CHRISTOPHER OVERTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
OVERTON v. EMMERICH
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner: MARCELLUS OVERTON
Respondent: E. EMMERICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WELCHES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01634
Petitioner: KENNETH ALLEN WELCHES
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv01611
Respondent: TRENT ALLEN
Petitioner: TYRON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CALDERON v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00443
Respondent: J. WADAS
Petitioner: REYNALDO CALDERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLAY v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner: DAMIAN CLAY
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SERNA v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01616
Respondent: ODELL, IYC, DONALD EMERSON and others
Petitioner: RONALD SERNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRADO-VALERO v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00441
Respondent: J. WADAS
Petitioner: JOSE A. PRADO-VALERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?