US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 8,125
SERNA v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01616
Respondent:
ODELL, IYC, DONALD EMERSON and others
Petitioner:
RONALD SERNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRADO-VALERO v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00441
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Petitioner:
JOSE A. PRADO-VALERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01543
Petitioner:
DEVORIS JAMES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
DEVORIS JAMES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VANDERMOLEN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
KURTIS JAMES VANDERMOLEN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DURHAM v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01528
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
DARRELL S. DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERSON v. WADDAS
as 2:2024cv00428
Petitioner:
SHANE LOUIS PETERSON
Respondent:
J. WADDAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv01502
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Petitioner:
DAMIEN BLAINE SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRAZIER v. INDIANA STATES ATTORNEY
as 2:2024cv00420
Respondent:
INDIANA STATES ATTORNEY
Petitioner:
LEROY WALTER FRAZIER, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. KELSAW et al
as 1:2024cv01453
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER, CHRISTINA GRAYER, MIA KELSAW and others
Petitioner:
KEVIN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
