District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 111,724
VERONA HOLDINGS, INC. v. FRONTIER NORTH, INC.
as 1:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
VERONA HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant:
FRONTIER NORTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
an individual v. dba QUALITY INN & SUITES
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
K.A., an individual
Defendant:
SHRIIJI, INC., dba QUALITY INN & SUITES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
LONNIE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARDNER v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
JALIEN GARDNER
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PANNELL v. SCHILDMEIR, ET AL
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
DAVID PANNELL
Defendant:
RONALD SCHILDMEIR, AMANDA BRIDEGROOM and WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA S. STEPHENS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Spriggs v. Graham et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jason Patrick Spriggs
Defendant:
Corey Graham and Lutheran Kosciusko Hospital
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATTON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
