Indiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 127
MIMMS ET AL. v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.
as 1:2015cv00970
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MIMMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Mattress Warehouse v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mattress Warehouse
Defendant:
John Doe, American Mattress and Google Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lybolt v. Darragh et al
as 2:2015cv00113
Defendant:
Ida Darragh and North American Registry of Midwives, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lybolt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX ENERGY GROUP LLC v. SCHWEIHS
as 1:2015cv00438
Plaintiff:
APEX ENERGY GROUP LLC
Defendant:
BOILERMAKER WINDOW LLC and DANIEL SCHWEIHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sample v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC
as 2:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
Marianne Sample
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YUDKIN et al v. RUBENSTEIN et al
as 1:2014cv02119
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN S. YUDKIN & ASSOCIATES PSC and FRANKLIN S. YUDKIN
Defendant:
ROBERT IMBODY, MAURER RIFKIN & HILL, PC and CLIFFORD T. RUBENSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
WILSON v. TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD, ET AL
as 2:2014cv00256
Defendant:
KYLEE BATEMAN, BLOOMFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, GEORGE DALLAIRE and others
Plaintiff:
LEAH WILSON and RODGER WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
DOE NO. 115 et al v. CHILDPLACE, INC.
as 4:2014cv00097
Defendant:
CHILDPLACE, INC.
Plaintiff:
MOTHER DOE and JOHN DOE NO. 115
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Marley v. Tractor Supply Company
as 1:2014cv00235
Plaintiff:
Charles Marley
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN SERVICES et al
as 1:2014cv01278
Defendant:
KRISTA CAUHEY, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN SERVICES, DOES 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
JERRI THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
