Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 30,212
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MARTIN
Defendant:
DAVID EMMERSON, CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF, OJO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEAGUE v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. TEAGUE, SR.
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DIANE PHEIFFER, I. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLISON v. COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
ASTRID ALLISON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
John W Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Branden Myers, Matthew Graves, Ethan Wood and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. State of Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Imari Butler
Defendant:
Indiana State of and Indiana Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIDES v. UNKNOWN OFFICER et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E. SIDES
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER, A. FENI and AKENADI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. UNKNOWN OFFICER #1 et al
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. TAYLOR, IV
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER #1, UNKNOWN OFFICER #2, HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
