US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,842
Chyma v. USA
as 1:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Kyle Anthony Chyma
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gagen v. USA
as 3:2023cv03024
Petitioner:
John Dwayne Gagen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rhodes v. Iowa
as 2:2023cv01010
Petitioner:
Dante K Rhodes
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. Brown
as 3:2023cv03023
Petitioner:
Demetrius Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grommet v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv02046
Petitioner:
Michael James Grommet
Respondent:
J Gilley and Attorney General, State Of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Artisani v. Iowa et al
as 6:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
Nersius Adonliel Artisani and Roger Joseph Hoffert, Jr
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Captain Neff, Lt Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Woodhouse Chevrolet, Missouri et al
as 5:2023cv04035
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Woodhouse Chevrolet, Missouri, Wells Fargo Bank, Raymond Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Barron v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Victor Barron
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
