US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa Social Security Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Nablo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Nablo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Delfs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2014cv00205
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dinann Marie Delfs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Crabtree v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2012cv00564
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Crabtree
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2012cv00338
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Hines
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Kincel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Toni J. Kincel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Hamlin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2010cv00399
Plaintiff:
Lloyd C. Hamlin, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Clancy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Blaine Alan Clancy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Clancy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2009cv00495
Plaintiff:
Blaine A. Clancy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Robertson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2009cv00496
Plaintiff:
Larry Warren Robertson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Beal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Julie M Beal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
