US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,186
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sx Job Discrimination (Sex)
Short's Burger & Shine, LLC et al v. MidWestOne Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Greater Iowa City, Inc., Elizabeth Craig, MH Legacy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Perez and Short's Burger & Shine, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Rockwell v. Dobrochowski
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Rockwell
Defendant:
Mary Dobrochowski
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Rockwell v. Aguilar
as 3:2024cv00053
Defendant:
Yvette Aguilar
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Rockwell
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2rl Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sx Job Discrimination (Sex)
Bonner v. Humility Homes & Shelter et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Darnell Bonner
Defendant:
Humility Homes & Shelter and Fred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Easton v. Wapello County District Court
as 4:2024cv00196
Defendant:
Wapello County District Court
Plaintiff:
Mark Easton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
