US District Court for the District of Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,832
Castaneda v. State of Kansas
as 5:2024cv03157
Petitioner:
Joshua R Castaneda
Respondent:
State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Jones
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) and A.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cole
as 5:2024cv03156
Respondent:
Shawnee County Jail and Brian Cole
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bottom v. Ackerman et al
as 5:2024cv03155
Defendant:
Timothy D. Ackerman and Timothy Anderson
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Bottom, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03154
Defendant:
Seth Osborn, Progress Review Panel, Kansas, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Ryan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. Johnson County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2024cv03152
Defendant:
Johnson County Board of Commissioners, Earl Taylor, Tony Booker and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeese v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv03153
Defendant:
(fnu) Anderson, Barbie (lnu) and (fnu) (lnu)
Plaintiff:
James W. McNeese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2024cv03150
Petitioner:
Bryce Eugene Wilkins, Sr.
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Nash et al
as 5:2024cv03151
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Scott
Defendant:
Barbara Nash and Jhon Steckel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paasch v. Commandant
as 5:2024cv03148
Respondent:
Commandant
Petitioner:
Ronnie Paasch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.