District of Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 1,391
Roedel v. Coffey County Jail
as 5:2015cv03120
Petitioner: Roger Roedel
Respondent: Coffey County Jail
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cook v. Maye
as 5:2015cv03118
Petitioner: Eugene G. Cook
Respondent: Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James (ID 77522) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03116
Petitioner: Tyron James
Respondent: James Heimgartner, Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv03107
Petitioner: Samuel H. McGee
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lester v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv03109
Petitioner: Carl L. Lester
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aubuchon v. Coffey County Jail
as 5:2015cv03100
Petitioner: John L. Aubuchon
Respondent: Coffey County Jail
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Shawnee County District Attorney et al
as 5:2015cv03095
Petitioner: Ervin Lee, Jr.
Respondent: Shawnee County District Attorney, Topeka Police Department, Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dougherty v. Attorney General of Kansas
as 5:2015cv03094
Petitioner: Beau Jay Dougherty
Respondent: Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pineda v. Maye
as 5:2015cv03092
Petitioner: Gonzalo Pineda
Respondent: Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nelson v. Roberts et al
as 5:2015cv03083
Petitioner: Jonathan S. Nelson
Respondent: Ray Roberts, Kansas, State of, Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.