Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 989
Ortega v. Brock

as 5:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Ismael Deleon Ortega, Jr.
Defendant:
Randy Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd (ID 74149) v. McCausland

as 5:2023cv03210
Plaintiff:
Todd J. Lloyd
Defendant:
Paul S. McCausland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sibley v. Bush et al

as 5:2023cv03209
Plaintiff:
Michael Sibley
Defendant:
Nathaniel Bush and Karl Sheppelmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingsley (ID 54123) v. Groene et al

as 5:2023cv03207
Plaintiff:
Alan W. Kingsley
Defendant:
Steven A. Groene, Seth A. Vernon, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Johnstone et al

as 5:2023cv03190
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Williams
Defendant:
Jared Johnstone and (fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Kansas, State of et al

as 5:2023cv03188
Plaintiff:
Roger Allen Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Wichita, City of, Arrow Wrecker Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake (ID 96323) v. Williams et al

as 5:2023cv03186
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Deputy Warden Bos, Deputy Warden House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (ID 79020) v. Wyandotte County District Court et al

as 5:2023cv03185
Plaintiff:
Ronald Johnson
Defendant:
Wyandotte County District Court and Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sibley v. Walmart et al

as 5:2023cv03177
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Sibley and Michael Sibley
Defendant:
Walmart and Jaydon (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Sowers et al

as 5:2023cv03160
Plaintiff:
Vernon P. Turner
Defendant:
Travis Sowers, Kingman Police Department and Kingman, Kansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.