Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 906
Lewis v. Dodge City Community College
as 5:2022cv03207
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Dodge City Community College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (ID 116257) v. Dalke et al
as 5:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
Joel Arthur Davis
Defendant:
Remington Dalke and Audra Asher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Wright
as 5:2022cv03203
Plaintiff:
Shane Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Travis Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May (ID 41527) v. Bunting et al
as 5:2022cv03198
Plaintiff:
Tommy J. May
Defendant:
(fnu) Bunting, Melody Stroda and Dr. Jody Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Bennett et al
as 5:2022cv03196
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Taylor Bennett, Alison Brown, Janay Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Wichita Police Department, City of et al
as 5:2022cv03187
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Barnett
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, City of, Amy McCowen and Kenneth Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods (ID 77647) v. Crow et al
as 5:2022cv03191
Plaintiff:
Kishen Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Sam Crow, Korey A. Kaul, (fnu) Lolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods (ID 77647) v. Crow et al
as 5:2022cv03190
Plaintiff:
Kishen Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Sam Crow and Korey A. Kaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Chahine et al
as 5:2022cv03193
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Hatem Chahine, Jerry Wells and Josh Luttrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Woods
as 5:2022cv03167
Plaintiff:
Roger Allen Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Rodger Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
