US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Civil Rights Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 2,790
Klopp v. Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
William Klopp
Defendant:
Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board, Justin Mitchell, Sarah Weedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Sean Davis
Defendant:
City of Covington, Michael Lusardi and 1-10 Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aelstyn v. Sparks et al
as 5:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Michael Van Aelstyn
Defendant:
Coleman Sparks and Scott Carnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ellis v. Dennis et al
as 6:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ellis
Defendant:
Derek Dennis, James Barnett, Jerry Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
