US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,145
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 3:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Call et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Donald Lynn Martin
Respondent:
Matt Call and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Violett v. Grise et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Violett
Respondent:
Judge John R. Grise and Warden Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. Valentine et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Allen Wayne Hatcher
Respondent:
Warden Ann Valentine and Attorney General Russel Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Plappert
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Jerard Garrett
Respondent:
Laura Plappert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Hughes
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Kenneth W. Brown
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coffman v. Roby
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCullum v. Green
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Christopher McCullum
Respondent:
J. David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.