U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 174
Benton v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
Louisville Metropolitan Government, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Mark Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dunning et al
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Dunning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dunning et al
as 3:2017cv00542
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Dunning, Todd County Detention Center and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Ballard et al
as 3:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Jared Caldwell
Defendant:
Rodney Ballard , Frederick Kemen, MD , Aimee Mihalyov, ARPN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baxter v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael Baxter
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc. and Robert Lanning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Carlton Tucker Freeman, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky and Ms. Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Paul Mays
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Webb Strange, Cordant Health Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Thurby et al
as 4:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Duron Campbell
Defendant:
Thurby, Payne, Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Webster County Jail et al
as 4:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Jennings
Defendant:
Webster County Jail, Terry Elders, Mary Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bailey
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Randy Ingram, John Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
