Kentucky Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,076
Southern v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Kristal Southern
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Estes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Estes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Garmon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moreno v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Catherine Moreno
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cleary v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Cleary
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Brandy C. Carver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Craig v. SSA
as 5:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Rodney Craig
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Drury v. SSA
as 5:2024cv00324
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Jacob Drury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Perks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Domita Perks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.