Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,907
White v. Akers
as 5:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Anu White
Defendant:
Daniel Akers and Damon Hininger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Cox et al
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Brison Stephenson
Defendant:
Darrell Cox, Sharon Hardin, Deputy Robert Gravett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Smith et al
as 0:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Fairrel D. Smith, John D. Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Regina
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Claude Cox
Defendant:
Nurse Regina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wright et al
as 1:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Quinton Wright and Logan County Sherrif's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Martin
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Gary Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Akers
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Anu White
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Spalding et al
as 3:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Nichols
Defendant:
Samuel Todd Spalding, Rhonda Thomas and Kim May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Kentucky State Police Official Office et al
as 5:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Terquise Barnes
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police Official Office, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Fayette County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yokely v. Ky Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Yokely
Defendant:
KY Department of Corrections, Jose Rodriguez, Dexter Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
