District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Prison Condition Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 792
Smith v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
as 7:2016cv00213
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burnett v. Kentucky Correctional Psychiatric Center et al
as 0:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
L.D. Burnett
Defendant:
Kentucky Correctional Psychiatric Center, Department of Corrections, Hackman
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Saad et al
as 6:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
Donald Choya Bates
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, R. Mulac, R. Smith
and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Warner v. Quintana
as 5:2016cv00365
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Warner
Defendant:
Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davenport v. State of Kentucky
as 6:2016cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Davenport
Defendant:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vanderpool-Helton v. Fayette County Detention Center et al
as 5:2016cv00354
Plaintiff:
Felisha Vanderpool-Helton
Defendant:
Fayette County Detention Center, Jeremy Abney, J. Price
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Kizziah
as 7:2016cv00202
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Key, II
Respondent:
Kizziah
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henderson v. Greenup, City of et al
as 0:2016cv00110
Plaintiff:
Cody Ryan Henderson
Defendant:
Greenup, City of, Mike Wothington, Scott Prince
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00343
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bailey
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Randy Ingram, John Dunn
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall et al v. Conover et al
as 3:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Sharon Hall, Brianna McCombs
Defendant:
Janet Conover, Vanessa Kennedy, Randy Hargis
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.