District of Kentucky Court Cases

Cases filed

Cases 11 - 20 of 34,136
Arnott v. Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a King's Daughters Medical Center
as 0:2015cv00032
Plaintiff: Anthony Todd Arnott
Defendant: Ashland Hospital Corporation d/b/a King's Daughters Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Anders v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00395
Plaintiff: Kimberly K. Anders
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tekno, Inc. v. Han-Tek NC, LLC
as 1:2015cv00063
Plaintiff: Tekno, Inc.
Defendant: Han-Tek NC, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00393
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: Fair Credit Reporting Act
Estate of Dorothy Faye Lanham v. Springfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
as 3:2015cv00397
Plaintiff: Estate of Dorothy Faye Lanham
Defendant: Springfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
United States of America v. $10,448 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2015cv00398
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $10,448 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Ward v. Alvis et al
as 3:2015cv00389
Plaintiff: Willie R. Ward
Defendant: Alvis, Mark Bolton, Starr N. Nudkins
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcelroy v. Cordish Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00390
Plaintiff: Shelton Mcelroy
Defendant: Cordish Companies, Inc. , Louisville Irish, LLC, Entertainment Consulting International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
Yarbrough v. United States
as 5:2015cv00124
Petitioner: John Yarbrough
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cheatham v. Professional Bull Riders Incorporated
as 3:2015cv00391
Plaintiff: Kathy Cheatham
Defendant: Professional Bull Riders Incorporated
Cause Of Action: nr Notice of Removal
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.