US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 149
United States of America v. Diggs
as 2:2024cv02886
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Melinda L. Diggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. Simmons
as 2:2024cv02885
Defendant:
Anthony C Simmons
Plaintiff:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. Herron
as 2:2024cv02658
Defendant:
Ashley Herron
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. Jenkins
as 2:2024cv02379
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Crystal Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. Bradley
as 2:2024cv01644
Defendant:
Travis Bradley
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Direct Steel, LLC v. Tri-C Civil Construction, LLC
as 2:2024mc01552
Defendant:
Tri-C Civil Construction, LLC
Plaintiff:
Direct Steel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Assa Abloy Entrance Systems US, Inc. v. Aviation Hangar Door Services, LLC
as 2:2024cv01258
Defendant:
Aviation Hangar Door Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Assa Abloy Entrance Systems US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Nguyen v. United States Government
as 2:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Jackhai Nguyen
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Corporate Realty Inc v. New Orleans I Holdings LLC
as 2:2023cv07273
Plaintiff:
Corporate Realty Inc
Defendant:
New Orleans I Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Patriot Construction Services, L.L.C. v. Champagne
as 2:2023cv07135
Plaintiff:
Patriot Construction Services, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Jason Champgane
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
