US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 19,123
Moon v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2022cv03068
Plaintiff:
Linda Nicholson Moon
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dinicola v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Paul Dinicola
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Crist v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2022cv02810
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Crist
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moree et al v. Chevron Pipeline Company et al
as 2:2022cv02829
Defendant:
Zylem, Inc. doing business as Goulds Water Technology also known as Goulds Pumps, S J Electro Systems, Chevron Pipeline Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moree and Fran Moree
Intervenor:
Luba Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duhe v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2022cv02798
Plaintiff:
Eddie Duhe, Jr.
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reddick v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02715
Plaintiff:
DAVID REDDICK
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Naquin v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02629
Plaintiff:
Matthew Naquin
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hare v. Air Plains Services Corporation, et al
as 2:2022cv02306
Plaintiff:
David Craig Hare
Defendant:
Textron, Inc., Avco Corporation, Avstar Fuel Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2022cv02118
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Taylor
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abadie v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
Mary Abadie
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
