U.S. District Court for the District of Maine Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 955
REARDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2025cv00154
Plaintiff:
NATHAN REARDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TORRE v. LEIGHTON
as 2:2025cv00132
Plaintiff:
VINCENT TORRE, JR
Defendant:
JESSICA LEIGHTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TORRE et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2025cv00127
Plaintiff:
VINCENT TORRE and LYNN TORRE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, NATALIE ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TORRE v. LANE et al
as 2:2025cv00128
Plaintiff:
VINCENT TORRE, JR
Defendant:
VICTORIA LANE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and WINDHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CLARK v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES
as 1:2025cv00121
Plaintiff:
HEATHER CLARK
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
TORRE v. STATE OF MAINE
as 2:2025cv00118
Plaintiff:
VINCENT TORRE, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE
Unknown:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
IN RE: ALEXANDER MCNEIL
as 2:2025mc00150
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
REARDON v. OSWALD et al
as 1:2025cv00093
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR REARDON
Defendant:
MITCHELL OSWALD and UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
INMAN-ARBO v. ALMY
as 1:2025cv00086
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE INMAN-ARBO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ALMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIBBY et al v. FECTEAU et al
as 1:2025cv00083
Plaintiff:
LAUREL D LIBBY, RONALD P LEBEL, WENDY MUNSELL and others
Defendant:
RYAN M FECTEAU and ROBERT B HUNT
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
