U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland Social Security Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 4,850
Calhoun v. Dudek
as 8:2025cv00612
Plaintiff:
Kanjuette Calhoun
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Biscoe v. King
as 8:2025cv00495
Plaintiff:
Marge Elaine Biscoe
Defendant:
Michelle King
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gould v. King
as 1:2025cv00482
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wayne Gould
Defendant:
Michelle King
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Parker v. King
as 1:2025cv00473
Plaintiff:
Melika Parker
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cooper v. King
as 1:2025cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kanan Kordell Cooper
Defendant:
Michelle King
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sutton v. King
as 1:2025cv00434
Plaintiff:
Cleta Sutton
Defendant:
Michelle King
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shirk v. King
as 8:2025cv00417
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Ricardo Shirk
Defendant:
Michelle King and Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barber v. King
as 1:2025cv00418
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Barber
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kline v. King
as 1:2025cv00416
Plaintiff:
Melody P. Kline
Defendant:
Michelle King
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Haas v. King
as 1:2025cv00380
Plaintiff:
Chad Lewis Haas
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
