US District Court for the District of Maryland Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 9,837
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ash v. Bredar
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Ash
Defendant:
Judge James K. Bredar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Neal et al v. Frayer et al
as 8:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEAL and ANDRE LINTHICUM
Defendant:
Brian S. Frayer and City of Mount Rainier, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
R.B. et al v. Smith et al
as 8:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
H. R.B., J. B. and D. R.B.
Defendant:
J. Scott Smith and St. Mary's County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Doe et al v. Children's National Hospital
as 8:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
John Doe, II and Mrs. John Doe, II
Defendant:
Children's National Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
