Maryland Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 447
CTP Innovations, LLC v. Command Web Offset Company, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01470
Plaintiff:
CTP Innovations LLC
Consol_defendant:
Command Web Offset Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
CTP Innovations, LLC v. Sandy Alexander, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01471
Plaintiff:
CTP Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Sandy Alexander, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Merck & CIE et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv01472
Plaintiff:
Merck & CIE , Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant:
Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Allen Video Technology, Inc. v. SIM2 U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2015cv01064
Plaintiff:
Allen Video Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
SIM2 U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Allen Video Technology, Inc. v. Optoma Technology, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00999
Plaintiff:
Allen Video Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Optoma Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Allen Video Technology, Inc. v. BenQ America Corp.
as 1:2015cv00967
Plaintiff:
Allen Video Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
BenQ America Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Allen Video Technology, Inc. v. Viewsonic Corporation
as 1:2015cv00886
Plaintiff:
Allen Video Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Viewsonic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
M-Edge International Corporation v. ACCO Brands Corporation
as 1:2015cv00795
Plaintiff:
M-Edge International Corporation
Defendant:
ACCO Brands Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Allen Video Technology, Inc. v. Planar Systems, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00657
Plaintiff:
Allen Video Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Planar Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Allen Video Technology, Inc. v. Christie Digital Systems USA, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
Allen Video Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Christie Digital Systems USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
