Maryland Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 864
Gray v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv02353
Plaintiff:
Louise Gray
Defendant:
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Sciegen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Soltyka v. Monsanto Company
as 8:2022cv02100
Plaintiff:
Nicole Soltyka
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Gorham v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2022cv01566
Plaintiff:
Shamia Gorham
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Pedersen v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 8:2022cv01497
Plaintiff:
Nadean Pedersen
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and Cook Medical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Preston v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 8:2022cv01495
Plaintiff:
Dena Preston
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and Cook Medical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cunha v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2022cv01224
Plaintiff:
Wilhelmina J Cunha
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Hawks v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
Jerry W Hawks
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Mira v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2022cv01135
Plaintiff:
Carla M Mira
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Romesburg et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Nathan Romesburg and Kristen Romesburg
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Andrew Marshall and Tamra Marshall
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
