Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 13,808
Manning v. Campbell
as 8:2019cv02450
Petitioner: Kevin Robert Manning
Respondent: Casey M. Campbell
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Asemani v. State of Maryland
as 1:2019cv02449
Respondent: State of Maryland
Petitioner: Billy G. Asemani
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winston v. Maryland Division Of Corrections et al
as 8:2019cv02463
Respondent: Govenor Larry Hogan, Maryland Division Of Corrections
Petitioner: Stanley Ray Winston
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Prince George County Detention Center et al
as 1:2019cv02464
Defendant: Aramark Corporation, Corizon Health Services, Prince George County Detention Center
Plaintiff: Jonathan S. Wallace
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wise v. Storie
as 1:2019cv02413
Defendant: Adam Storie
Plaintiff: Christopher Wise
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Grahm et al
as 1:2019cv02448
Plaintiff: Darrell Lee Hicks
Defendant: Corizon Health, Richard Graham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewan v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv02398
Plaintiff: Stanley H.R. Ewan
Defendant: United States of America, Doe(s) I, OSI Special Agent(s) Responsible for Destruction of Property, Doe(s) II Staff Judge Advocate(s) Responsible for Destruction of Property
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Langley v. USA-2255.
as 1:2019cv02397
Respondent: USA-2255.
Petitioner: Larvon Langley
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Glasscho v. USA - 2255
as 1:2019cv02383
Respondent: USA - 2255
Petitioner: Kevin Glasscho
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rasberry v. USA - 2255
as 8:2019cv02446
Respondent: USA - 2255
Petitioner: Demetrius Darrius Rasberry
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?