US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,607
Haley v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv10458
Petitioner:
Mark Xavier Haley, II
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ridley v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10389
Petitioner:
Kelly Ridley
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Yahtues v. Kennedy
as 1:2024cv10065
Petitioner:
Malachi I. Yahtues
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purdy v. Bridgewater State Hospital
as 1:2024cv10286
Petitioner:
Chad Michael Purdy
Respondent:
Bridgewater State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera v. U.S District Court
as 1:2024cv10268
Petitioner:
Benito Rivera
Respondent:
U.S District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shiner v. Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv10100
Petitioner:
Dominic Shiner
Respondent:
Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Souza v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10208
Petitioner:
Jeffrey A Souza
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDRADE v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv10189
Petitioner:
Jonathan Andrade
Defendant:
Warden
Other:
prose tracking nefpsCPO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10124
Petitioner:
Craig Smith
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Superintendent MCI Shirley
as 1:2024cv10057
Petitioner:
Maurice Morrison
Respondent:
Superintendent MCI Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
