District Court Cases in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 71,083
Hsu v. Hsu
as 1:2025cv11264
Plaintiff:
Nien-Hsi Hsu
Defendant:
Jong-Ping Hsu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Schrader v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2025cv11262
Plaintiff:
Lisa Schrader
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Sease v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2025cv11265
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sease
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Sellers v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2025cv11267
Plaintiff:
Justin Sellers
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Sharpnack v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2025cv11272
Plaintiff:
Joy Sharpnack
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Slagle v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2025cv11273
Plaintiff:
Darrell Slagle
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Coon v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2025cv11277
Plaintiff:
Diane Coon
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bezanson et al v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2025cv11270
Plaintiff:
Ayva Bezanson, Eric Bezanson and Amie Bezanson
Defendant:
Rachel Dobbs, Amesbury Public Schools and City of Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv11276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv11266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.