District Court Cases in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 64,743
Morrar v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12166
Plaintiff:
Nizar Morrar
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Silvestro v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12170
Plaintiff:
Nicole Silvestro
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Barry Sita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Brooks v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12172
Plaintiff:
David L. Brooks
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michaud v. Direct Funding Now, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12160
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michaud
Defendant:
Direct Funding Now, LLC, Christian Murillo, Jane Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Norwood Laboratories, Inc. v. PCI Synthesis, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12171
Plaintiff:
Norwood Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
PCI Synthesis, Inc., Sequens Group and Sequens CMDO North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Davenport
as 1:2023cv12159
Plaintiff:
Peter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Austin v. Azucar Tapas Bar Corporation
as 1:2023cv12158
Plaintiff:
Will Austin
Defendant:
Azucar Tapas Bar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sramcik v. Unum Group et al
as 1:2023cv12165
Plaintiff:
Julie Sramcik
Defendant:
Unum Group and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Wiggs v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12164
Plaintiff:
Michael Wiggs
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
