Massachusetts Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 192
Casey et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv10916
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Kristopher Casey and Adams Square Baptist Church
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker and Steven M. Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACA International v. Maura Healey
as 1:2020cv10767
Defendant:
Maura Healey
Plaintiff:
ACA International
Spyropoulos v. Baker et al
as 4:2020cv40025
Defendant:
Melanie Eresian, Ara Eresian, Jr., Ry-Co International, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Spiro Spyropoulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vapor Technology Association et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv12048
Plaintiff:
Adam Webster, Rising Sun Vapors LLC, Vapor Technology Association and others
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker and Commissioner of DPH Monica Bharel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mass Dynamics, LLC et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv12035
Defendant:
Governor Charles D Baker, Commissioner of DPH Monica Bharel and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Plaintiff:
Boston Vapor, LLC, Mass Dynamics, LLC, Linda and Jeffrey Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Connell v. Gross et al
as 1:2019cv11654
Plaintiff:
Robert . O'Connell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, John McDonough, Angela Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Toop v. Rollins
as 1:2019cv11602
Plaintiff:
Audra Toop
Defendant:
Rachel Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bethoney et al v. Youngclaus et al
as 1:2019cv10777
Defendant:
Mary O'Sullivan Smith, Dora Pina, Deborah Casell and others
Plaintiff:
D.J.G, Katherine Bethoney, T.G and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mullane v. Reardon
as 1:2019cv10656
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mullane
Defendant:
Roberta Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullane v. Gants et al
as 1:2019cv10407
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mullane
Defendant:
Michele B Hogan, Maura Healey and Ralph D. Gants
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
