Massachusetts Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 489
Fennel v. RJB Stone Ltd
as 1:2020cv10522
Plaintiff:
Fennel and Amanda Fennel
Defendant:
RJB Stone Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy et al v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv40029
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc, Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Roy, Richard Roy and Jeffrey Lavelle
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Barron v. US Med Acquisition, Inc.
as 1:2020cv10300
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Barron
Defendant:
US Med Acquisition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Leonardo v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 1:2020cv10245
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leonardo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Green v. D2L LTD et al
as 1:2020cv10241
Defendant:
D2L Ltd and John Baker
Plaintiff:
Susan Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munoz v. Au Pair Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10184
Plaintiff:
Silvia Juliana Forero Munoz
Defendant:
Intrax Inc. dba AuPairCare, Marcie Schneider, Au Pair Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mitchell et al v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation
as 1:2020cv10110
Plaintiff:
Nada Yousif and Dywuan Mitchell
Defendant:
Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cervantes v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10106
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, CRST Expedited, Inc. and CRST International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fang DeBoever v. Mellon Investments Corporation
as 1:2020cv10078
Defendant:
Mellon Investments Corporation
Plaintiff:
Connie Fang DeBoever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franco et al v. RDI Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10018
Defendant:
RDI Last Mile, Inc., Richard J. Deslongchamps, Jr., RDI Logistics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Guy and Francisco Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
