US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,908
Corley v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv12881
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Corley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
R.E.S.V. et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv12863
Plaintiff:
J.A.S.V. and R.E.S.V.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rahaman v. Radden et al
as 2:2024cv12865
Plaintiff:
Joy Rahaman [E-filer]
Defendant:
Dr. Louis Radden and Dr. Michael Bagley, D.O.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
R.E.S.V. et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv12858
Plaintiff:
R.E.S.V. and J.A.S.V.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Brown v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv12856
Defendant:
John Doe, Ryan Smith, Joshua Swallwell and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Brown
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Padilla v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv12812
Plaintiff:
Daniel Padilla
Defendant:
Conversenow Technologies, Inc. and Domino's Pizza, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Krider v. Brinker Michigan, Inc.
as 2:2024cv12798
Plaintiff:
Shawna Krider
Defendant:
Brinker Michigan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Cerrato v. Canton Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv12778
Defendant:
Jared Peterson, Kenneth Robinson, Robert Pasick and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geovanni Cerrato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fahlbush v. The Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2024cv12766
Defendant:
The Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maureen Fahlbush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lawson v. Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Inc.
as 2:2024cv12758
Defendant:
Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.