US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,689
Franks v. USA
as 2:2024cv10027
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Franks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Furlong v. USA
as 2:2023cv13277
Petitioner:
Michael James Furlong
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Olaya v. USA
as 2:2023cv13240
Petitioner:
Juan Olaya
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson-Brown v. USA
as 4:2023cv13153
Petitioner:
Michael Deangelo Johnson-Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vandiver v. USA
as 2:2023cv12972
Petitioner:
Cary Dale Vandiver
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2023cv12788
Petitioner:
Kaylin E. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Drinkwine v. USA
as 4:2023cv12774
Petitioner:
Paul M. Drinkwine
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. USA
as 2:2023cv12771
Petitioner:
Robert Brown, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tempo v. USA
as 2:2023cv12532
Petitioner:
Demarco Tempo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perkins v. USA
as 2:2023cv12517
Petitioner:
Rashaan Perkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
