US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 217
Humboldt B.V. et al v. Lornic Design, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00983
Plaintiff:
Humboldt B.V. and MPS North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Lornic Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Comfort Research, LLC v. Le Pouf, LLC
as 1:2017cv00979
Plaintiff:
Comfort Research, LLC
Defendant:
Le Pouf, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Comfort Research, LLC v. Comfy Sacks LLC
as 1:2017cv00974
Plaintiff:
Comfort Research, LLC
Defendant:
Comfy Sacks LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Comfort Research, LLC v. Panda Sleep Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00968
Plaintiff:
Comfort Research, LLC
Defendant:
Panda Sleep Inc. and Qingwei Wang
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Morren v. Morren Plastic Molding, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Morren, Sr.
Defendant:
Morren Plastic Molding, Inc. and Twin Bay Docks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Mt. Derm GmbH et al v. 8 Layer Inc.
as 1:2017cv00593
Plaintiff:
Mt. Derm GmbH and Nouveau Cosmetique USA, Inc.
Defendant:
8 Layer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sunstar Americas, Inc. et al v. Ranir LLC
as 1:2017cv00511
Plaintiff:
Sunstar Americas, Inc. and Interbros GmbH
Defendant:
Ranir LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Camatic Proprietary Limited et al v. Irwin Seating Company
as 1:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
Camatic Proprietary Limited and Camatic Seating Inc.
Defendant:
Irwin Seating Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
St. Martin Investments, Inc. v. Bandit Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00472
Plaintiff:
St. Martin Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Bandit Industries, Inc. and Smoracy, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Comfort Research, LLC v. Ace Bayou Corporation
as 1:2017cv00449
Plaintiff:
Comfort Research, LLC
Defendant:
Ace Bayou Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
