District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 2,333
Jones #271144 v. Winn
as 1:2015cv00518
Petitioner: Christopher M. Jones #271144
Respondent: Thomas Winn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin #226111 v. Berghuis
as 1:2015cv00514
Petitioner: Marcus Maurice Martin #226111
Respondent: Mary Berghuis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller #226319 v. Rivard
as 1:2015cv00517
Petitioner: Tyronza Miller #226319
Respondent: Steven Rivard
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin #272958 v. Winn
as 1:2015cv00507
Petitioner: Harold Nicolas Martin #272958
Respondent: Thomas Winn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith #742633 v. Woods
as 2:2015cv00073
Petitioner: Isaiah Z. Smith #742633
Respondent: Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kamps v. Passenger et al
as 1:2015cv00503
Petitioner: Bruce Kamps, Ray Cox, James Courtate
Respondent: Donald Passenger, 61st District Court of the State of Michigan, Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer #753452 v. McKee
as 1:2015cv00502
Petitioner: James Marquis Spencer #753452
Respondent: Kenneth T. McKee
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diffendal #854623 v. MacLaren
as 2:2015cv00070
Petitioner: Rodney Kevin Diffendal #854623
Respondent: Duncan MacLaren
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hrrahman #146127 v. Rivard
as 1:2015cv00472
Petitioner: Ramzy Abdul Hrrahman #146127
Respondent: Steve Rivard
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer #762645 v. Palmer
as 1:2015cv00458
Petitioner: Paris Deron Palmer #762645
Respondent: Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.