US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 3,625
Snell v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2022cv01147
Petitioner:
Roy L. Snell, Jr.
Respondent:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Swank #444755 v. Rewerts
as 1:2022cv01139
Petitioner:
Donald Swank #444755
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickett #485575 v. Rewerts
as 1:2022cv01081
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Pickett #485575, Jr.
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Aguilar #609503 v. Corrigan
as 1:2022cv01070
Petitioner:
Benigno Perez-Aguilar #609503
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark #957553 v. King
as 1:2022cv01058
Petitioner:
Warren Clark #957553
Respondent:
Christopher King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones #842932 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv01061
Petitioner:
Christopher Rashawn Jones #842932
Respondent:
James R. Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Staffney #122425 v. Corrigan
as 2:2022cv00215
Petitioner:
Harold Staffney #122425
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cassaday #71417-509 v. Woods
as 1:2022cv01044
Petitioner:
Kevin Cassaday #71417-509
Defendant:
William Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Askew v. Bailey
as 1:2022cv00985
Petitioner:
Corey Alan Askew
Respondent:
Paul Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Flowers #244656 v. Morrison
as 1:2022cv00981
Petitioner:
Vashon Flowers #244656
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.