US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 231 - 240 of 3,626
Martin #21605-040 v. Michigan, State of
as 1:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
Rodney Martin #21605-040
Respondent:
Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ulrich #253327 v. Burgess
as 1:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Ulrich #253327
Respondent:
Michael Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore #960770 v. Rewerts
as 1:2022cv00103
Petitioner:
Brenitaze Moore #960770
Respondent:
Randy Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oom #385246 v. Christiansen
as 1:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Max Henry Oom #385246
Respondent:
John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Littlejohn #141899 v. Macauley
as 1:2022cv00080
Petitioner:
Juivonne Littlejohn #141899
Respondent:
Matt Macauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rios v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00069
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Edward Perez Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wolter #290901 v. Christiansen
as 1:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
William Wolter #290901
Respondent:
John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tims #876496 v. MaCauley
as 1:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
Jauwan Tims #876496
Respondent:
Matt MaCauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perron #527537 v. Schroeder
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kasey Perron
Defendant:
Warden Sarah Schroeder
Petitioner:
Kasey Perron #527537
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kranz #803848 v. Horton
as 2:2022cv00006
Petitioner:
Earl Robert Kranz #803848
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
