Michigan Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 136
Superior Glogal Logistics LLC v. Michigan Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2010cv13747
Plaintiff:
Superior Glogal Logistics LLC
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Transportation, Kirk T. Steudle, Michigan State Transportation Commission and others
The Mason and Dixon Lines, Incorporated et al v. Steudle, et al
as 2:2010cv12285
Plaintiff:
The Mason and Dixon Lines, Incorporated , Universal Am-Can, Ltd. and Mason Dixon Intermodal, Inc.
Defendant:
Kirk T. Steudle and Ted B. Wahby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kowalski v. Koster CASE TRANSFERRED
as 1:2010cv12180
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Kowalski
Defendant:
Chris Koster
Kinder v. Northwestern Bank
as 1:2010cv00405
Plaintiff:
Nancy Kinder
Defendant:
Northwestern Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Resto World Music LLC v. YRC, Inc.
as 2:2010cv11540
Plaintiff:
Resto World Music LLC
Defendant:
YRC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Hog Brothers Recycling, LLC
as 2:2009cv13626
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Hog Brothers Recycling, LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
China Pacific Property Insurance Co. v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Incorporated et al
as 2:2009cv13544
Plaintiff:
China Pacific Property Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Incorporated and Priority Container Line Co.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Type:
Other Statutes
Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis v. Hog Brothers Recycling, LLC
as 2:2009cv13522
Plaintiff:
Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis
Defendant:
Hog Brothers Recycling, LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. K&M Recycling
as 1:2009cv13381
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
K&M Recycling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
