US District Court for the District of Minnesota Torts - Property Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 885
MatrixCare Inc. v. Netsmart Technologies, Inc.
as 0:2019cv01684
Defendant:
Netsmart Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
MatrixCare Inc.
Ahlgren v. First National Bank of Omaha, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv01647
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha, Scheels All Sports, Inc. d/b/a Scheels, Scheels All Sports, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Assignee Erik A Ahlgren and Erik A. Ahlgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Advanced Control Technology, Inc. v. Iverson et al
as 0:2019cv01608
Plaintiff:
Advanced Control Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven Iverson, John Iverson, Elite IBS LLC and others
Ahlgren v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 0:2019cv01607
Plaintiff:
Erik A. Ahlgren
Defendant:
Cabela's LLC, Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One Bank (USA), National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ahlgren v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 0:2019cv01576
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Erik A. Ahlgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tharp v. CitiMortgage Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv01295
Plaintiff:
Kevin T. Tharp
Defendant:
Christopher Daniel Davies and CitiMortgage Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TENww, LLC v. DPIS Engineering LLC
as 0:2019cv01234
Plaintiff:
TENww, LLC
Defendant:
DPIS Engineering LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PeopleScout MSP, LLC v. ARA, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv00824
Defendant:
ARA, Inc., Goodwin William, LLC, Temporary Plus, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
PeopleScout MSP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ahlgren v. Link et al
as 0:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Link's Wild Safaris and Jay Link
Plaintiff:
Erik A. Ahlgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ahlgren v. Muller et al
as 0:2019cv00303
Defendant:
Diekie Muller Hunting Safaris and Diekie Muller
Plaintiff:
Erik A. Ahlgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.