District Court Cases in Minnesota
Cases 21 - 30 of 84,087
HRE LLC et al v. Doe 1 et al
as 0:2024cv01474
Plaintiff:
HRE LLC, Hellmuth & Johnson, PLLC and Auto-Rec Bodyworks, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Billups v. USA
as 0:2024cv01479
Petitioner:
Brandon Travis Billups
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lasley v. Neumann et al
as 0:2024cv01476
Plaintiff:
Edward Evan Lasley
Defendant:
Neumann, Mohamed, Rice County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilera Diaz et al v. Svihel et al
as 0:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
Allan Juseth Aguilera Diaz, Nahun Alexander Barahona Amador, Jerson Ariel Betanco Flores and others
Defendant:
John J. Svihel and Svihel Vegetable Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Human Trafficking
Mckie v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2024cv01455
Plaintiff:
Jessie Mckie
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Digimedia Tech, LLC v. Midcontinent Communcations
as 0:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Digimedia Tech, LLC
Defendant:
Midcontinent Communcations
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Nanodropper, Inc v. J4J, LLC
as 0:2024cv01475
Plaintiff:
Nanodropper, Inc
Defendant:
J4J, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Kane v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Kane
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Vectair Systems Inc. v. Fresh Products, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Vectair Systems Inc.
Defendant:
Fresh Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
