Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,650
Bobo v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv00988
Petitioner:
Theodore Harold Edward Bobo, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner:
Cederic Lamont Berry
Respondent:
Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Brott et al
as 0:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Julyen Alozno Martin
Defendant:
Joel Brott, Sherburne Jail Commander, Jail Captains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horswell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00949
Petitioner:
Phillip Harold Horswell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. LOHMEIER
as 0:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Mr JOHN HAROLD LOHMEIER, Pltf
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Newcomb v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00876
Petitioner:
Justin Newcomb
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garwood v. Minnesota State Patrol et al
as 0:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Rick Lee Garwood
Defendant:
Minnesota State Patrol, Nick Otterson, Morrison County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redwine v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
Terrance Redwine
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Berumen v. Segal et al
as 0:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Irene Berumen
Defendant:
Michael Segal, L. Linder, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon v. Sherburne County Sheriff et al
as 0:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Brandon, III
Defendant:
Sherburne County Sheriff, Joel Brott and Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
