Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,839
Reyes-Salinas v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03808
Petitioner:
Julio Reyes-Salinas
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goodman v. Peters
as 0:2024cv03818
Petitioner:
Isaiah Goodman
Respondent:
Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bierbrauer v. DOC et al
as 0:2024cv03812
Defendant:
Chrystal Anderson, Henry D, Dettloff and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bierbrauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv03804
Petitioner:
John Wayne Brooks
Respondent:
Jerad Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buckhanan v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv03798
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Xavier Jerome Buckhanan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tichich v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv03792
Respondent:
Paul Schnell and Minnesota Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Thomas Robert Tichich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kroger et al v. FBI, The et al
as 0:2024cv03772
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Kroger and Phyllis Lane Kroger
Defendant:
Glenn Moule, FBI, The and Unnamed FBI Agents and Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Traylor v. Gary et al
as 0:2024cv03758
Defendant:
Gary, Michael Warner, Hennen and others
Plaintiff:
Rayco Traylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Morales v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv03761
Petitioner:
Juan Eduardo Rodriguez Morales
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03740
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Petitioner:
Christopher Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.