Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 5,873
Kroger et al v. FBI, The et al
as 0:2024cv03772
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Kroger and Phyllis Lane Kroger
Defendant:
Glenn Moule, FBI, The and Unnamed FBI Agents and Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Traylor v. Gary et al
as 0:2024cv03758
Defendant:
Gary, Michael Warner, Hennen and others
Plaintiff:
Rayco Traylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Morales v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv03761
Petitioner:
Juan Eduardo Rodriguez Morales
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03740
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Petitioner:
Christopher Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cullar v. Warden, FCI Sandstone
as 0:2024cv03741
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Sandstone
Petitioner:
Paris M. Cullar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Franklin v. Bolin et al
as 0:2024cv03736
Defendant:
Eric Hennen, Jenny Carufel and William Bolin
Plaintiff:
Mark Franklin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentino v. Hall et al
as 0:2024cv03719
Defendant:
Steve Hall, Ramsey County Sheriff and other Ramsey County sheriff's employee's to be named later
Plaintiff:
Justice Anthony Valentino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheng v. Rardin et al
as 0:2024cv03712
Defendant:
Chad Orum, Ethan Derr and Jared Rardin
Plaintiff:
Sheng-Wen Cheng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv03713
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buchan v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv03683
Petitioner:
Brent Douglas Buchan
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
