Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 5,861
Thomas-El v. Kekic et al
as 0:2024cv03476
Defendant:
Tarek Kekic, Hennepin County Self-Insured and Nhia Thor
Plaintiff:
Soloman Thomas-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallegos v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv03480
Petitioner:
Alexander Gallegos
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stewart v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03432
Petitioner:
Fredrick Stewart
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dickens v. Allen Parish Jail
as 0:2024cv03448
Petitioner:
Thomas Dickens
Respondent:
Allen Parish Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buckhanan v. USA
as 0:2024cv03430
Petitioner:
Xavier Jerome Buckhanan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gbor v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv03416
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Dulwonh Gbor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shay v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv03418
Petitioner:
Joseph Shay and Mark Shay
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zills v. Zehoski et al
as 0:2024cv03420
Defendant:
Michael Schneider, Matthew Zehoski, Ron Bergman and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Zills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivy v. Bolin et al
as 0:2024cv03425
Defendant:
Corey Anderson, Dan Moe, Carufel and others
Plaintiff:
Rashad Ramon Ivy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazley v. Hennepin Cty Med. Ctr et al
as 0:2024cv03428
Defendant:
Hennepin Cty ADC, Classification Officer, D. Hutchinsen and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Kevin Hazley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.