US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,000
Hagen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00164
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Marshandra Jearnice Ozien Hagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Dominique Hines
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pettis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Pettis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hicks v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lyn Hicks
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cannon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rena Hayes Cannon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Monger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Clayton A. Monger, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Deborah Anne Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Nelson Carlisa and Carlisa Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Giutta v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Toby A. Giutta
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moody v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Moody
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
